From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Mozilla picks a DSCM system.... an amusing read Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:26:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20070416102658.GD27533@thunk.org> References: <46a038f90704152126v4c214a9at76870abffeccb611@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90704152127t43949a51h601e35cc4fc6aa7d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Martin Langhoff X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 16 12:27:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HdOQR-0002uB-9o for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:27:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030325AbXDPK1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:27:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030346AbXDPK1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:27:07 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:47153 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030325AbXDPK1G (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:27:06 -0400 Received: from root (helo=candygram.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtps (tls_cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1HdOWh-00075B-RG; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:33:40 -0400 Received: from tytso by candygram.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HdOQE-0000nr-Kg; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:26:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46a038f90704152127t43949a51h601e35cc4fc6aa7d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:27:51PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On 4/16/07, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >From a git POV, this is only the 2nd-best scenario -- once they are on > >hg, the barriers of migration to git are much lower. > > Specially if we write git-hgserver sometime soon ;-) Yeah, if I could clone myself or otherwise get a few weeks of uninterrupted hacking time, I'd be writing a bidrectional hg<->git gateway.... it's the main reason at this point why I haven't switched e2fsprogs to git. - Ted