From: Peter Baumann <peter.baumann@gmail.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any objectsions to enhancing git-log to show tags/branch heads?
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:07:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070417050704.GA19925@xp.machine.xx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070416182749.GG23764@fieldses.org>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:27:49PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 08:13:52PM +0200, Peter Baumann wrote:
> > I'll do this gitk jump very often, too. Just to get the big picture where my
> > branches are (inside the commit graph). As they stay normaly on the tip, I
> > exit gitk long before it reached the root commit. What I'd like to have is
> > something which shows me _visually_ the the branches, e.g.
> >
> > master
> > | next commit comment for next
> > o | commit comment for master~1
> > | o commit comment for next~1
> > o | [ ... guess whats next :-) you get the idea ...]
> > | o
> > | |
> > o /
> > |
>
> git show-branch?
>
> --b.
No. git-show-branch produces output like the snippet below, which is totally
non obious to me. Yes, I could figure out what it means, but why the hell
_should_ I if there are tools for which you have to look just for a second
on the ouput to _fully_ understand whats happening?
-Peter
xp:~/src/git (master)$ git show-branch
! [editpatch] Merge branch 'maint'
* [master] Merge branch 'jc/index-output'
! [pu] Merge branch 'jc/diff' into pu
---
- [master] Merge branch 'jc/index-output'
* [master^2] git-read-tree --index-output=<file>
* [master^2^] _GIT_INDEX_OUTPUT: allow plumbing to output to an alternative index file.
* [master^^2] Makefile: Add '+' to QUIET_SUBDIR0 to fix parallel make.
* [master~2^2] git-bisect: allow bisecting with only one bad commit.
* [master~2^2^] t6030: add a bit more tests to git-bisect
* [master~2^2~2] git-bisect: moderni
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-16 12:45 Any objectsions to enhancing git-log to show tags/branch heads? Theodore Ts'o
2007-04-16 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-16 20:46 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-16 18:13 ` Peter Baumann
2007-04-16 18:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-17 5:07 ` Peter Baumann [this message]
2007-04-17 13:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-16 19:01 ` Julian Phillips
2007-04-17 5:08 ` Peter Baumann
2007-04-16 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-17 2:21 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-17 2:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-04-17 3:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-23 10:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-17 3:15 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070417050704.GA19925@xp.machine.xx \
--to=peter.baumann@gmail.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).