From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Baumann Subject: Re: Any objectsions to enhancing git-log to show tags/branch heads? Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:08:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20070417050808.GC29569@xp.machine.xx> References: <20070416181352.GB29569@xp.machine.xx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Julian Phillips To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 17 07:14:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hdg1m-0005ZQ-8X for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:14:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030671AbXDQFOu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:14:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753993AbXDQFOu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:14:50 -0400 Received: from magnum.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.23.34]:54103 "HELO mail.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753975AbXDQFOu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:14:50 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 401 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:14:49 EDT Received: (qmail 31211 invoked by uid 0); 17 Apr 2007 05:08:07 -0000 Received: from ho135.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de (HELO localhost) (p.b@hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de@172.17.27.135) by mail.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de with SMTP; 17 Apr 2007 05:08:07 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org, Julian Phillips Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070403 (2007-04-02) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 08:01:29PM +0100, Julian Phillips wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Peter Baumann wrote: > > > > > master > > | next commit comment for next > > o | commit comment for master~1 > > | o commit comment for next~1 > > o | [ ... guess whats next :-) you get the idea ...] > > | o > > | | > > o / > > | > > > > tig comes near it, but it only linerarises the branches, so you can't see > > where there was a mergepoint/fork. I'd really like these visuallization of > > the commit graph in some of the text viewers. I normally don't care about > > the _full_ commit text, only if I visually understand what's happening I'm > > looking at the individual commits and the patches. > > If you turn on the revision graph visualisation (press 'g' whil in main > view) then tig will show merges and forks ... looks a little like your > diagram above in fact. > > -- > Julian > Nice. I didn't now of this feature. Peter