From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix overwriting of files when applying contextually independent diffs
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:58:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070418215856.GA2477@steel.home> (raw)
Noticed by applying two diffs of different contexts to the same file.
The check for existence of a file was wrong: the test assumed it was
a directory and reset the errno (twice: directly and by calling
lstat). So if an entry existed and was _not_ a directory no attempt
was made to rename into it, because the errno (expected by renaming
code) was already reset to 0. This resulted in error:
fatal: unable to write file file mode 100644
For Linux, removing "errno = 0" is enough, as lstat wont modify errno
if it was successful. The behavior should not be depended upon,
though, so modify the "if" as well.
The test simulates this situation.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
---
Found it. Somewhat unusual situation, I admit, but splitting
patches just to apply them would be too annoying. GNU patch
accepts such patches too, not even a warning.
builtin-apply.c | 3 +--
t/t4121-apply-diffs.sh | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t4121-apply-diffs.sh
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index fd92ef7..94311e7 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -2416,8 +2416,7 @@ static void create_one_file(char *path, unsigned mode, const char *buf, unsigned
* used to be.
*/
struct stat st;
- errno = 0;
- if (!lstat(path, &st) && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode) && !rmdir(path))
+ if (!lstat(path, &st) && (!S_ISDIR(st.st_mode) || !rmdir(path)))
errno = EEXIST;
}
diff --git a/t/t4121-apply-diffs.sh b/t/t4121-apply-diffs.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..2b2f1ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4121-apply-diffs.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='git-apply for contextually independent diffs'
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+echo '1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7
+8' >file
+
+test_expect_success 'setup' \
+ 'git add file &&
+ git commit -q -m 1 &&
+ git checkout -b test &&
+ mv file file.tmp &&
+ echo 0 >file &&
+ cat file.tmp >>file &&
+ rm file.tmp &&
+ git commit -a -q -m 2 &&
+ echo 9 >>file &&
+ git commit -a -q -m 3 &&
+ git checkout master'
+
+test_expect_success \
+ 'check if contextually independent diffs for the same file apply' \
+ '( git diff test~2 test~1; git diff test~1 test~0 )| git apply'
+
+test_done
+
--
1.5.1.1.876.ge36f76
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-18 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-18 21:58 Alex Riesen [this message]
2007-04-18 22:32 ` [PATCH] Fix overwriting of files when applying contextually independent diffs Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070418215856.GA2477@steel.home \
--to=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox