From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Waitz Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:07:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20070419100757.GB27208@admingilde.org> References: <7vodly0xn7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vr6qlxexe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v647tcjr6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 19 12:08:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeTYb-0003Zg-8t for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:08:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161483AbXDSKH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:07:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161487AbXDSKH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:07:59 -0400 Received: from mail.admingilde.org ([213.95.32.147]:53739 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161483AbXDSKH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:07:58 -0400 Received: from martin by mail.admingilde.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1) id 1HeTYT-00004x-EE; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:07:57 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v647tcjr6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 05:04:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * lt/gitlink (Sun Apr 15 11:14:28 2007 -0700) 17 commits >=20 > Stalled; Alex has a set of tests that should go on top of this > series but I haven't taken a look at it yet. I think we should > have enough for interested people to start futzing with, and I > am wondering why nobody has sent a note saying "Hey, I did this > using tree objects with commits in it, it works nicely for these > operations but these things are still cumbersome to do and I > need to polish it more". You know that I am interested, but sadly I don't have as much time to really have a look / work on it as I'd liked. But Linus' series looks very good from what I've seen now. Conceptually Linus approach is very much identical my prototyping work and I am convinced that it is the right way to go. Only his code is much better (hey, it's Linus after all ;-) and about our branch-vs-HEAD discussion, well we'll see how it works out. Now, how to go on? The next thing we need is a real checkout & merge support -- but that is not that hard. Then we need to think about how to handle the submodule object database, e.g. when fetching. I'd also like to be able to support bare supermodule repositories which include all neccessary submodule objects. But I guess we need some more experience with submodules before we can solve that in a scalable way. --=20 Martin Waitz --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJz99j/Eaxd/oD7IRApv1AJ0URqwLYJw0B6r+iFyyACz4Dqh7EACeIjUe dCmevw2R+oirXk+LJnKg9LU= =6ryn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/--