From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Lichtenheld Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-cvsserver: Add a basic test file for cvsserver Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:29:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20070501112943.GP7085@planck.djpig.de> References: <11778774271937-git-send-email-frank@lichtenheld.de> <7vfy6h7wsb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Martin Langhoff To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 01 13:39:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HiqhJ-00079i-6y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 13:39:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754308AbXEALiq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 07:38:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754389AbXEALiq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 07:38:46 -0400 Received: from planck.djpig.de ([85.10.192.180]:1631 "EHLO planck.djpig.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754296AbXEALiq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 07:38:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by planck.djpig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC3B88003; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:38:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at planck.djpig.de Received: from planck.djpig.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (planck.djpig.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuSOQqZdUFHP; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by planck.djpig.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AE6FF8803C; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vfy6h7wsb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:50:12AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > But a git-cvsserver test suite that can be run from "make test" > is a really good thing to have for us. > > I haven't pursued this but have you considered :fork: connect > method instead of :ext:, so that you do not have to use pserver > nor ssh connection? Ok, I have to confess I never heard of :fork: before :| (or forgot about it again) Thanks for the tip... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld www: http://www.djpig.de/