From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Shoemaker Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink". Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20070505173547.GA3540@pe.Belkin> References: <20070504224639.26133.6157.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> <20070505131352.GB3379@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Yann Dirson , Catalin Marinas , git@vger.kernel.org To: Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hasselstr=F6m?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 05 19:35:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HkOAi-0005PG-Gf for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 19:35:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934073AbXEERft convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934105AbXEERft (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:49 -0400 Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.240.7]:35572 "EHLO eastrmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934073AbXEERfs (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:48 -0400 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070505173549.SGST19390.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 5 May 2007 13:35:49 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.0.253.29]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id vVbn1W00E0epFYL0000000; Sat, 05 May 2007 13:35:47 -0400 Received: from chris by localhost with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HkOAd-00018o-Mr; Sat, 05 May 2007 13:35:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070505131352.GB3379@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Karl Hasselstr=F6m wrote: > On 2007-05-05 00:53:03 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: >=20 > > Well, it looks like the voices we heard on this naming issue were > > quite equally cast towards each of the 2 name. > > > > Let my vote be to get back to "sink", so the user can easily pair > > the command with "float". I expect that any previously-silent > > majoity prefering "bury" will talk now, before Catalin decides if h= e > > wants this patch in the next release :) >=20 > Well, my vote is still for "sink"! If it is to be called "stg bury", > I'd have to vote for changing "stg float" to "stg unearth". :-) Just my 2.5 cents: float/sink are clearly related, while I wouldn't associate float/bury at all. Also, "bury" is sometimes euphemistic for "kill", so bury/resurrect is a clear pair. Anyway, "sink" makes perfect sense to me. -chris