From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Waitz Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Support ent:relative_path Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 20:52:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20070506185259.GF30511@admingilde.org> References: <463BD40C.6080909@gmail.com> <20070505033039.GD16538@spearce.org> <20070505193214.GD30511@admingilde.org> <7vy7k3hvog.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070505211857.GE30511@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tMbDGjvJuJijemkf" Cc: Junio C Hamano , "Shawn O. Pearce" , Dana How , Git Mailing List To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 06 20:53:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hklr6-00045a-9F for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 20:53:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754962AbXEFSxD (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 14:53:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754999AbXEFSxD (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 14:53:03 -0400 Received: from mail.admingilde.org ([213.95.32.147]:55635 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754962AbXEFSxB (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 14:53:01 -0400 Received: from martin by mail.admingilde.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1) id 1Hklqt-0001Ft-TS; Sun, 06 May 2007 20:52:59 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --tMbDGjvJuJijemkf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:17:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > we could also introduce "/" for absolute path entri= es. > > >=20 > > > When you name the tree-ish with usual "branch name", where does > > > the branch name end and pathname start? What happens when there > > > is an ambiguity, and how costly to detect such an ambiguity to > > > begin with? > >=20 > > well, if you know that it starts with a tree-ish there is no > > ambiguity [...] >=20 > Wrong. For example, mw/submodules~10 _is_ a tree-ish (if you have a branc= h=20 > named "mw/submodules"). so what? a better argument is that one can have both refs/tags/a and refs/heads/a/b. So just forget my suggestion... --=20 Martin Waitz --tMbDGjvJuJijemkf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPiQLj/Eaxd/oD7IRAu0fAJ9uhcRnlWGJQl8S9oNtbZW4wUhP8gCeNFbY 9L8YEumRA8NmUqMIXpiQHXc= =yefM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tMbDGjvJuJijemkf--