From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Sixt <J.Sixt@eudaptics.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Merging commits together into a super-commit
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:22:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070510192212.GP13719@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vef0350y.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:30:37AM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> So, compared to the rebase usage, this does add two commands for
> bookkeeping the original state and cleaning it up. But the syntax for
> the cherry-pick part is quite a bit simpler than the original rebase
> at least.
Yeah, something like that would be great. I think I've seen others
suggest similar syntax before, so it's probably just a question of one
of us who want this finding time to write the patches.
> Also, "reset --hard" isn't actually what I want in this case. I'd like
> this recipe to use something that would move the current branch to
> some other point, but in a safe way, (that is, not destroy any
> uncommitted changes that might exist at the beginning). I don't have
> any proposal for what that would be.
The tag creation and cleanup could get to be annoying too. You could
scrounge through the reflog instead of using a temporary tag, but
depending on the amount of --amend'ing and cherry-picking you do the
reflog entry may end up in a different place each time, so it's probably
hard to make this automatic.
> stg - This probably works great if you're using it as a primary
> interface. But trying to use it as a quick one-off when
> generally using core git does not work well at all. Instead of
> the two "git tag" commands in my recipe above, an stg recipe
> would involve a lot of additional bookkeeping with stg init, stg
> uncommit [N times for fixing a commit N steps back in the
> history], stg goto, stg push, etc.
I also didn't like having to come up with another name for each
patch--I'd rather just run git-log or gitk and cut-n-paste the sha1.
For kernel work I started out working with multiple (sym- or
hard-linked) trees, then used akpm's patch scripts, then stgit. I think
I'm happiest just using plain git.
The one thing I've never been good at is keeping the history of the
patch series itself.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 10:51 Merging commits together into a super-commit Alex Bennee
2007-05-10 11:19 ` Raimund Bauer
2007-05-10 11:32 ` Alex Bennee
2007-05-10 11:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-10 11:40 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-05-10 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-10 16:57 ` Carl Worth
2007-05-10 17:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-10 18:30 ` Carl Worth
2007-05-10 19:21 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-10 19:48 ` Carl Worth
2007-05-10 20:02 ` Using StGIT for tweaking already-committed stuff Petr Baudis
2007-05-10 21:16 ` Carl Worth
2007-05-11 5:48 ` Integrate StGIT into Git? (Was: Re: Using StGIT for tweaking already-committed stuff) Jan Hudec
2007-05-10 22:23 ` Using StGIT for tweaking already-committed stuff Karl Hasselström
2007-05-11 20:40 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-11 22:43 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-12 7:10 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-12 11:09 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-10 20:29 ` Merging commits together into a super-commit Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-12 11:34 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-12 13:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-12 14:02 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-12 14:41 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-12 17:03 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-12 19:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-13 18:43 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-13 19:35 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-14 19:28 ` [StGIT PATCH] Store branch description in the config file Karl Hasselström
2007-05-10 19:22 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-05-10 19:47 ` Merging commits together into a super-commit Petr Baudis
2007-05-10 19:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-12 9:53 ` Transactions for git (and stgit) ? Yann Dirson
2007-05-12 10:49 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-12 18:34 ` Yann Dirson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-10 21:55 Merging commits together into a super-commit linux
2007-05-11 11:54 ` Alex Riesen
[not found] ` <9909dee80705110537j7e6d1426p7723c110c0a2c667@mail.gmail.com>
2007-05-11 12:41 ` Eugine Kosenko
2007-05-12 13:02 ` Jan Hudec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070510192212.GP13719@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=J.Sixt@eudaptics.com \
--cc=cworth@cworth.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).