From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Lichtenheld Subject: Re: Commit ID in exported Tar Ball Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:48:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20070517174807.GM5272@planck.djpig.de> References: <20070517163803.GE4095@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <200705171857.22891.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Glanzmann , Michael Gernoth To: Johan Herland X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 17 19:48:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hok5r-0001BH-Dv for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:48:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756519AbXEQRsM (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 13:48:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759413AbXEQRsL (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 13:48:11 -0400 Received: from planck.djpig.de ([85.10.192.180]:3634 "EHLO planck.djpig.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759688AbXEQRsK (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 13:48:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by planck.djpig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440C688060; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:48:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at planck.djpig.de Received: from planck.djpig.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (planck.djpig.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qCIeQQEgaggu; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by planck.djpig.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A05C688061; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200705171857.22891.johan@herland.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Johan Herland wrote: > Hmm, doesn't seem like git-tar-tree (or git-archive for that matter) > supports this out of the box. Maybe it's possible to achieve in combination > with the $Id$ construct? $Id$ contains the blob id, not the commit id. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld www: http://www.djpig.de/