From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hasselstr=F6m?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new git-cp command, transposed from stgit. Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:57:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20070518075700.GA14813@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> References: <20070517204129.17502.21864.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Yann Dirson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 18 09:57:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HoxLA-0004cy-2q for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 09:57:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755142AbXERH5Z convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 03:57:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755174AbXERH5Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 03:57:25 -0400 Received: from diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.90.142]:1077 "EHLO diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755142AbXERH5Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 03:57:24 -0400 Received: from kha by diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HoxKe-0003rN-00; Fri, 18 May 2007 08:57:00 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070517204129.17502.21864.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> X-Manual-Spam-Check: kha@treskal.com, clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2007-05-17 22:49:00 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > A known annoying limitation of this version (very quickly adapted) > is that quoted files in the "git ls-files" output trigger the > assert() clause. I'd use "-z", but it looks like noone wrote a > zero-separated file reader for python (how that makes me regret perl > ;). > > I can surely write one, but do we want this to be in python after > all ? At least in perl it would be easy to fix this issue, but do we > even accept perl scripts for such features ? OTOH, I'm not sure it > is worth rewriting in C... I was under the impression that perl was somewhat acceptable, while python is not used in git anymore? --=20 Karl Hasselstr=F6m, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle