From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Verdoolaege Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] git-read-tree: take --submodules option Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:08:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20070518220826.GM942MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> References: <11795163053812-git-send-email-skimo@liacs.nl> <11795163061588-git-send-email-skimo@liacs.nl> <20070518215312.GB10475@steel.home> Reply-To: skimo@liacs.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 19 00:08:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpAco-0000qs-Fs for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 00:08:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754761AbXERWIb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 18:08:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754953AbXERWIb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 18:08:31 -0400 Received: from psmtp12.wxs.nl ([195.121.247.24]:57549 "EHLO psmtp12.wxs.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754761AbXERWIb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 18:08:31 -0400 Received: from greensroom.kotnet.org (ip54515aaa.direct-adsl.nl [84.81.90.170]) by psmtp12.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.15 (built Nov 14 2006)) with SMTP id <0JI9000LDC63RE@psmtp12.wxs.nl> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 00:08:29 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 11636 invoked by uid 500); Fri, 18 May 2007 22:08:26 +0000 In-reply-to: <20070518215312.GB10475@steel.home> Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I noticed there's a whole thread about subprojects that I haven't read yet, so this may have been addressed already .... On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:53:12PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote: > Can we have this option (and corresponding support in the following > patches, of course) first? That's why the clone thing comes last. > It is enough to have subprojects working > locally, and people can start using them immediately: anyone can clone > the subprojects manually if he wishes so. Anyone can run git-write-tree and git-commit-tree is she wishes so... > Cloning of subprojects is still unclear, and frankly I'm not sure it > should be done at all. Not even with an option which is off by > default. Then don't use it. The reason for not putting this in shouldn't be that someone doesn't think it is useful; the reason should be that my code is crap. skimo