From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl =?utf-8?q?Hasselstr=C3=B6m?= Subject: [StGIT PATCH 0/5] Metadata format versioning Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 02:09:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20070519000451.4906.87089.stgit@yoghurt> References: <20070516062711.GA7235@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 19 02:10:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpCWK-0002GJ-0i for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 02:10:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754102AbXESAJ4 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 20:09:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754717AbXESAJ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 20:09:56 -0400 Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:59763 "EHLO ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754102AbXESAJ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 20:09:56 -0400 Received: from c83-250-140-11.bredband.comhem.se ([83.250.140.11]:54505 helo=yoghurt) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HpCWA-000234-7L; Sat, 19 May 2007 02:09:54 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[127.0.1.1]) by yoghurt with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HpCW2-0001Jv-KV; Sat, 19 May 2007 02:09:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070516062711.GA7235@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> User-Agent: StGIT/0.12 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HpCWA-000234-7L. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HpCWA-000234-7L c46f36a59b7277cfc8d815867b708094 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2007-05-16 08:27:11 +0200, Karl Hasselstr=C3=B6m wrote: > I'll probably have time to whip up a patch later today. OK, so this turned out to be a slight miscalculation. But here it is, with a test! The test contains two small tarballs, so I had to whip up binary patch support as well. > I'll make a single version bump for the format changes you've alreay > applied, and re-do the format-changing patches you haven't applied > yet so that they have version bumping integrated. This contains a single version bump (1 -> 2) for the applied changes, but i haven't updated the DAG patch to use this yet. That's for another day. --=20 Karl Hasselstr=C3=B6m, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle