From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hasselstr=F6m?= Subject: Re: StGIT unhelpfulness Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:15:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20070522141545.GA15546@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> References: <20070522111603.GH4489@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 22 15:18:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HqUG7-0008MJ-5c for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:18:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756488AbXEVNS1 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 09:18:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756564AbXEVNS1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 09:18:27 -0400 Received: from diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.90.142]:2136 "EHLO diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756488AbXEVNS1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 09:18:27 -0400 Received: from kha by diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HqV9N-0004Af-00; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:15:45 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070522111603.GH4489@pasky.or.cz> X-Manual-Spam-Check: kha@treskal.com, clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2007-05-22 13:16:03 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > stg pull: Rebasing would possibly lose data I agree. I've also hit this problem, but with "stg rebase". I just submitted a bug for this: https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?9181 --=20 Karl Hasselstr=F6m, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle