From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: fastimport pull request Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:56:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20070624225643.GL17393@spearce.org> References: <20070622232458.GK17393@spearce.org> <7vr6o1ouv9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 25 00:56:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I2b0l-0007uj-CN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:56:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751226AbXFXW4u (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:56:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751202AbXFXW4u (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:56:50 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:48808 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081AbXFXW4t (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:56:49 -0400 Received: from [74.70.48.173] (helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1I2b0Y-0007qt-8D; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:56:38 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E733B20FBAE; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:56:43 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vr6o1ouv9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > I had an impression from reading #git log and mailing list > traffic, that you guys were afraid that the development history, > and especially the commit log messages on this branch, were, eh, > less than optimal. So I got curious and took a look --- it does > not look too bad. It is a nontrivial amount of code (1.5k lines > of Python) and is understandable to have meaningful history > behind it. That was true of the first version of the branch offered up by Simon. After my initial reply Simon cleaned up the history and made many of the messages more meaningful, and added SBO lines to them. So the history you saw when you pulled was much improved over the original version we were discussing on the list. -- Shawn.