From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: [PATCH] git init: activate rerere by default Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:40:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20070705214032.GB8751@steel.home> References: <81b0412b0707050610mddaf5c0w724b747fe10ed6f9@mail.gmail.com> <7vsl82dcj0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vfy42d6m0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 05 23:40:39 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I6Z43-0007Xb-FV for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:40:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759957AbXGEVkg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:40:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760289AbXGEVkg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:40:36 -0400 Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.189]:11628 "EHLO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759817AbXGEVkf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:40:35 -0400 Received: from tigra.home (Fa824.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.168.36]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo30) (RZmta 8.3) with ESMTP id n000e7j65LKc0M ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:40:33 +0200 (MEST) Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DB4277BD; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by steel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BEEFCC164; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-RZG-AUTH: z4gQVF2k5XWuW3Ccul2ggTYT9w== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin, Thu, Jul 05, 2007 21:22:43 +0200: > Yes, templates are nice. But I don't think that templates are the way to > go for introducing nice features as rr-cache. Looks like you're trying to enforce the feature, not introduce. It changes the user-visible behaviour, and this can be unexpected. It is not like you see people asking question: "How do I avoid repeating the same boring conflict?" every day on vger or irc. That said, the templates are installed with every make install (and I suppose with every .deb and .rpm), and template is copied in every new repo, so people will get the rr-cache sooner or later. What's wrong with "a bit later" than "much sooner"?