From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: git cvsimport branches not consistent with CVS branches Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:22:46 +0200 Message-ID: <200707081422.46466.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> References: <46903396.1010507@heydon.com.au> <200707081253.06129.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Brian Downing , Gordon Heydon , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 08 14:21:59 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I7Vm2-0001rQ-Eu for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:21:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751584AbXGHMVq convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:21:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751170AbXGHMVq (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:21:46 -0400 Received: from [83.140.172.130] ([83.140.172.130]:26712 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085AbXGHMVq (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:21:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CF38026DB; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19373-04; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.9.0.8] (unknown [10.9.0.8]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F81802663; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:14:43 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: s=F6ndag 08 juli 2007 skrev Johannes Schindelin: > Hi, >=20 > On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Robin Rosenberg wrote: >=20 > > Corecode's fromcvs is pretty fast and incremental and AFAIK accurat= e. >=20 > The only problem is that it is a misnomer: it is not fromcvs, but fro= mrcs,=20 > since you have to have access at the _files_. This is not always=20 > possible. A small problem considering that fromcvs works and the other don't. My = guess is that fromcvs kan be "fixed" to do remote access much more easily tha= n cvsimport can be "fixed" to import an archive properly. -- robin