From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] --decorate now decorates ancestors, too
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:27:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711022714.GI27033@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707110229320.4047@racer.site>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 02:29:49AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> The option --decorate changed default behavior: Earlier, it decorated
> commits pointed to by any ref. The new behavior is this: decorate the
> with the given refs and its ancestors, i.e.
>
> git log --decorate next master
>
> will show "next", "next^", "next~2", ..., "master", "master^", ...
> in parenthesis after the commit name.
I'm wondering how useful the default is. The arguments get used for
two things; both for git-log to decide what revisions to display, and
which refs to decorate, right? I'm not sure that overloading is such
a great idea.
Also, I note that "git log --decorate" does nothing at all. Maybe it
would be better to keep the default to be "any-ref" instead of "given"?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-11 1:28 [PATCH 0/4] Make --decorate more useful Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] Move add_name_decoration() and add_ref_decoration() to commit.[ch] Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 1:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] Move the --decorate option from builtin-log.c to revision.c Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-12 18:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-13 15:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 1:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] --decorate now decorates ancestors, too Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 2:27 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2007-07-12 18:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-14 0:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-21 22:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 1:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] --decorate: prefer shorter names Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711022714.GI27033@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).