From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mtimes of working files
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:26:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711202615.GE3069@efreet.light.src> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707111940080.4516@racer.site>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1273 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 19:42:10 +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> > > > How difficult is it to have script (or maybe existing git option)
> > > > that would make mtimes of all working files equal to time of last
> > > > commit ?
>
> Now I slowly get really curious. Does _anybody_ know a scenario where
> this makes sense?
>
> (No, Eric, there are enough corner cases where your example of a clustered
> webserver breaks down, so I am not fully convinced that this is a useful
> case.)
>
> Anybody enlighten me?
I don't see any case where it would be useful, though I know some version
control systems that provide that feature. I think it is supposed to just be
used for checking which view has newer version.
I first thought the idea had something to do with make, but it will actually
promptly break most build tools, because change to earlier version is
a change too, but they wouldn't detect it.
However I am getting really curious about different thing -- the solution.
Because I think the arguments from keyword expansion discussion apply here
that prevent any *reliable* (you can have unreliable ones just as you can
have unreliable keyword expansion) solution.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-11 15:08 mtimes of working files Yakov Lerner
2007-07-11 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 18:36 ` Yakov Lerner
2007-07-11 18:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-11 20:26 ` Jan Hudec [this message]
2007-07-12 7:57 ` Andy Parkins
2007-07-12 17:27 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-13 0:37 ` Theodore Tso
2007-07-13 23:00 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-13 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-13 23:46 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-14 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-14 0:36 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-14 0:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-14 0:49 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-14 1:29 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-07-14 13:23 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-07-14 13:09 ` Julian Phillips
2007-07-14 22:22 ` Jan Hudec
2007-07-14 22:36 ` Julian Phillips
2007-07-15 1:46 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-07-12 6:26 ` Eric Wong
2007-07-12 13:05 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-07-12 18:25 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711202615.GE3069@efreet.light.src \
--to=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).