From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: VMiklos Subject: Re: question about git-submodule Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:07:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20070716110728.GQ7106@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <20070715135453.GE7106@genesis.frugalware.org> <20070715140244.GF999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> <20070715142624.GF7106@genesis.frugalware.org> <20070715144835.GI999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> <20070715150540.GH7106@genesis.frugalware.org> <20070715152101.GJ999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> <20070715154028.GI7106@genesis.frugalware.org> <20070715214530.GK999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> <20070715222948.GL7106@genesis.frugalware.org> <20070716103954.GM999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="THYEXwetZJOK3OLY" Cc: Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org To: skimo@liacs.nl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 16 13:07:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IAOQi-0007FB-Lc for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:07:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756565AbXGPLHj (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:07:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756287AbXGPLHj (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:07:39 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:47831 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755738AbXGPLHi (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:07:38 -0400 Received: from frugalware.elte.hu ([157.181.177.34] helo=genesis.frugalware.org) by mx2.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1IAOQQ-0002Ey-6E from ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:07:37 +0200 Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 108531868213; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:07:29 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070716103954.GM999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --THYEXwetZJOK3OLY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Na Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:39:55PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege pisal(a): > No. You have to specify the specific revision of the subproject > that is included in any revision of the superproject. >=20 > Imagine someone making an incompatible change to a subproject. > You do not want to get this change in your copy of the superproject > unless the superproject has been adapted to this change. i don't say that the ability to stick to a given commit is bad, but imho there are scenarios where the ability to stick to a branch is better ok, i know, probably i should send a patch if i want this, then it can be discussed if this is useful or not anyway thanks for all your answers, now i at least know that what i wanted is currently not supported :) - VMiklos --THYEXwetZJOK3OLY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGm1Fwe81tAgORUJYRAlUIAJ9/ZLx6duG28R904bTYo9SLn6tnBACeJ+9n ln1/4GZkJAHOIT7gEcDz3ow= =Dqnd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --THYEXwetZJOK3OLY--