From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Glanzmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do _not_ call unlink on a directory Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:00:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20070716200024.GD16878@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <11846059721204-git-send-email-sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de> <469BC17D.60806@slamb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Scott Lamb X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 16 22:01:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IAWki-00016G-SE for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:01:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762654AbXGPUA3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:00:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762629AbXGPUA2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:00:28 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]:56091 "EHLO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762009AbXGPUA0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:00:26 -0400 Received: by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 31401) id 16CDC3F435; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:00:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <469BC17D.60806@slamb.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-05-02) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hello, > so I think this patch is the best that can be done. is there a reason why we call unlink and not remove? Thomas