From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] describe: Add unlisted option Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20070723074736.GJ32566@spearce.org> References: <87sl7fmyca.wl@mail2.atmark-techno.com> <20070723070308.GH32566@spearce.org> <7vabtnmusm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yasushi SHOJI , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 23 09:47:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICsdt-0008So-UO for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:47:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754158AbXGWHrm (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754136AbXGWHrm (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:42 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:45426 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754014AbXGWHrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:41 -0400 Received: from [74.70.48.173] (helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1ICsdk-00066E-Tr; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:37 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87CDE20FBAE; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:36 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vabtnmusm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > > Originally I left out --candidates and --debug when I wrote the code > > for them as I thought they were a tad too internal for casual use. > > But maybe it makes sense to include them in the usage string. > > I was actually going to suggest removing these options, that > were primarily meant for debugging and tweaking while we figure > out what the optimum default should be. Do you think they are > worth keeping? Yea, I do. I'd like to keep them in the code as sometimes I do look at their output. I'll even help maintain them, because they change oh so often. ;-) But if you really want them gone, I won't stop you. -- Shawn.