* git-apply versus git-am
@ 2007-07-23 7:54 Sean Kelley
2007-07-23 8:31 ` Alex Riesen
2007-07-23 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Kelley @ 2007-07-23 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?
git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff
Or am I missing something? (most likely the case!)
Sean
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: git-apply versus git-am
2007-07-23 7:54 git-apply versus git-am Sean Kelley
@ 2007-07-23 8:31 ` Alex Riesen
2007-07-23 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alex Riesen @ 2007-07-23 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Kelley; +Cc: git
On 7/23/07, Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?
>
> git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff
>
> Or am I missing something? (most likely the case!)
>
git apply is just a safer patch(1). They serve different purpose.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: git-apply versus git-am
2007-07-23 7:54 git-apply versus git-am Sean Kelley
2007-07-23 8:31 ` Alex Riesen
@ 2007-07-23 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-23 17:20 ` Timur Tabi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2007-07-23 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Kelley; +Cc: git
"Sean Kelley" <svk.sweng@gmail.com> writes:
> Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?
>
> git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff
>
> Or am I missing something? (most likely the case!)
applymbox is going away.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: git-apply versus git-am
2007-07-23 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2007-07-23 17:20 ` Timur Tabi
2007-07-23 17:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-23 17:37 ` Peter Baumann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2007-07-23 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Sean Kelley, git
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> applymbox is going away.
That sucks! I like git-am. Is there a replacement command that applies a patch and
commits it at the same time? If I use git-apply on a patch that adds new files, I need to
use git-add on the files before I can commit it. That's a real pain.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: git-apply versus git-am
2007-07-23 17:20 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2007-07-23 17:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-23 17:37 ` Timur Tabi
2007-07-23 17:37 ` Peter Baumann
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-07-23 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, Sean Kelley, git
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > applymbox is going away.
>
> That sucks! I like git-am.
Read it again. Junio talked about applymbox, not am.
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: git-apply versus git-am
2007-07-23 17:20 ` Timur Tabi
2007-07-23 17:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-07-23 17:37 ` Peter Baumann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Baumann @ 2007-07-23 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, Sean Kelley, git
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:20:40PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> applymbox is going away.
>
> That sucks! I like git-am. Is there a replacement command that applies a
> patch and commits it at the same time? If I use git-apply on a patch that
> adds new files, I need to use git-add on the files before I can commit it.
> That's a real pain.
'git am' isn't going away, but as Junio mentioned, 'git applymbox' is.
Those are two *different* programms doing roughly the same, but
'git applymbox' is superceded by 'git am'.
-Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: git-apply versus git-am
2007-07-23 17:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-07-23 17:37 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2007-07-23 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, Sean Kelley, git
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Read it again. Junio talked about applymbox, not am.
Sorry, for some reason I thought git-am is just a shortcut for git-applymbox.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-23 17:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-23 7:54 git-apply versus git-am Sean Kelley
2007-07-23 8:31 ` Alex Riesen
2007-07-23 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-23 17:20 ` Timur Tabi
2007-07-23 17:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-23 17:37 ` Timur Tabi
2007-07-23 17:37 ` Peter Baumann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).