From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Walter Subject: Re: StGIT (or guilt) + git-svn? Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:27:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20070724112706.GA9540@dervierte> References: <46A5D279.7060601@midwinter.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: 'git' To: Steven Grimm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 24 13:27:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDIXp-0004LS-Re for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:27:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764221AbXGXL1L (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:27:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764128AbXGXL1L (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:27:11 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.179]:24123 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764104AbXGXL1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:27:10 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so3632147pye for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=IM9HN5nzBm5ePnTs+2YTqd3rYOuTcbCoIdTWerDPHn9ftkUFraDbsMNmLulMbrmCxE1F2CCyPKqfP+lQ30xMbGbSr3XLUwFhQZMu3I6JVr4CvG+Qu6Lv40taCcqWyzeglhcOTzObqvLCluXMXgrh0PXVfP36WGYo9jicnnd3fd0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=s9Q0UsZBTkeyDRpr84eWwsXQrz47gmrxFvygZ74phfkTUDoEoClT+ZfkiKd9UxedyrAxAGVGp6Pl5u57/mi+K1PY0mk13NCPMIM+INSjrc1vzkfqaOx2Yq+DZ+eD65MX/Ax+61tWp0UKOTDnqa8YtLU7PKcy2f3elYBVAJnVdLE= Received: by 10.35.49.1 with SMTP id b1mr7697972pyk.1185276429229; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dasbrennen.isa-geek.org ( [74.131.192.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w67sm11823628pyg.2007.07.24.04.27.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dasbrennen.isa-geek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4DF1CC30F6; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:27:06 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A5D279.7060601@midwinter.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:20:41PM +0800, Steven Grimm wrote: > Anyone have experience mixing git-svn with either StGIT or guilt? A > coworker of mine was asking if he could do local versioning of files he > has no intention of committing to svn. He wanted a ".git-svnignore" kind > of scheme but I think his use case sounds like the sort of thing StGIT > and guilt are designed for. What I'm not sure about is whether git-svn > will confuse those tools or vice versa. I don't think I've ever seen > that combo discussed on the list. > > -Steve Well, I can say that stgit and git-svn in no way interfere with each other. I tend to use stgit to clean up my patch sets before commiting them, and have never had a problem. Thinking about what the tools do, I can't imagine that it would cause a problem. That said, I'm not sure that stgit will help you with "local versioning" of files (I'm not even sure what you mean). Perhaps you can elaborate on this point. -- -Steven Walter "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." -Robert Heinlein