From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-gui wording suggestions Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:40:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20070727044009.GF20052@spearce.org> References: <20070726111902.xqkxcdlsbo8w4c8k@webmail.tu-harburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Brett Schwarz , git@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Junio C Hamano To: Christian Stimming X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 27 06:40:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IEHci-0007gl-NZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:40:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751659AbXG0EkQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:40:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751671AbXG0EkQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:40:16 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:50665 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751536AbXG0EkO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:40:14 -0400 Received: from [74.70.48.173] (helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1IEHcY-0002Eg-8s; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:40:10 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2710B20FBAE; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070726111902.xqkxcdlsbo8w4c8k@webmail.tu-harburg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Stimming wrote: > Unifiy wording to say "to stage" instead of "to add" always. ... > With this patch I'd propose to talk every only about "stage" instead > of "add". IMHO that's just the logical conclusion of the above wording > decision. What do you think? Yes, I agree. This is a necessary change, the current wording is very confusing. I would apply this earlier than the other i18n stuff, but this patch is written based upon the current i18n work. :-| > diff --git a/git-gui.sh b/git-gui.sh > index 3536d38..fd8b4b4 100755 > --- a/git-gui.sh > +++ b/git-gui.sh > @@ -1824,12 +1824,12 @@ if {[is_enabled multicommit] || [is_enabled > singlecommit]} { > lappend disable_on_lock \ > [list .mbar.commit entryconf [.mbar.commit index last] -state] > > - .mbar.commit add command -label [mc "Add To Commit"] \ > + .mbar.commit add command -label [mc "Stage To Commit"] \ > -command do_add_selection > lappend disable_on_lock \ > [list .mbar.commit entryconf [.mbar.commit index last] -state] ... -- Shawn.