From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Fix allocation of "int*" instead of "int". Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: <200708010611.14171.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> References: <20070731144829.ea83d43d.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20070731195616.GA6329@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 01 06:03:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IG5RA-0006gA-LO for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:03:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750943AbXHAEDt convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:03:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750811AbXHAEDt (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:03:49 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27]:38212 "EHLO smtp1-g19.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbXHAEDs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:03:48 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6C81AB2B7; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bureau.boubyland (gre92-7-82-243-130-161.fbx.proxad.net [82.243.130.161]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BA31AB2B6; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:03:47 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20070731195616.GA6329@sigill.intra.peff.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Le mardi 31 juillet 2007 21:56, Jeff King a =E9crit : > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:48:29PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: > > - weights =3D xcalloc(on_list, sizeof(int*)); > > + weights =3D xcalloc(on_list, sizeof(int)); > > How about the correct-by-definition sizeof(*weights)? That's ok for me too. Thanks, Christian.