From: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>,
gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] user-manual: mention git gui citool (commit, amend)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708062136.50462.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070806035119.GB30269@fieldses.org>
måndag 06 augusti 2007 skrev J. Bruce Fields:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:26:21AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > A big warning would be out of place in what is for now just an isolated
> > > sentence in two different places. But I agree with you that this would
> > > be worth mentioning in any eventual full-fledged git-gui tutorial.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I am really wasted by this weekend's efforts to bring
> > msysgit.git along... could you be so kind as to cut&paste the relevant
> > section in a reply to me, so I do not have to search for myself?
>
> Sure; appended. This isn't that different from Steffen's proposal.
>
> > I would not normally ask for such a favour; it is relatively easy to go on
> > a search with Git, but I do have only 8 hours of sleep in the last 60
> > hours under my saddle...
>
> Hm. On the other hand, maybe we should just be refusing to feed your
> addiction till you get some sleep.
>
> I wanna keep this short for now, so if we really think we shouldn't
> mention of the hunk-selection thing without a warning, I'd rather just
> omit mention of it, and go for something like: "You can also use
> gitlink:git-gui[1] to create commits and view changes in the index and
> working tree", and drop the second hunk. Whatever.
Who reads manuals for GUI's? Rougly nobody, unless the user needs the gui
badly AND the GUI sucks badly. Manuals for GUI's are mostly tick-in-the-box
documentation (which is the probably reason most GUI documentation suck too).
Uncommon/dangerous features should generally be harder to find, but can you
can also use the common pattern of popping a dialog explaining the dangers
and forcing the user to click away the box. Of course there should be a
checkbox in the dialog "[X] Void warranty and don't bother me with this
question anymore."
Nevertheless the dangers should be explained somewhere, maybe in the git user
manual. I believe most people will learn from experience.
-- robin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-06 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-30 16:11 [PATCH] user-manual: mention git gui citool (commit, amend) Steffen Prohaska
2007-07-31 0:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-02 18:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-02 22:24 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-02 22:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-03 5:08 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-03 12:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-05 13:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-05 14:17 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-05 14:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-05 15:03 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-05 19:47 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-06 0:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-06 5:20 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-06 9:36 ` Steven Grimm
2007-08-06 11:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-05 22:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-05 22:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-06 0:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-06 3:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-06 19:36 ` Robin Rosenberg [this message]
2007-08-06 19:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-03 3:01 ` [PATCH] " Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-03 12:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-04 6:33 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-05 12:09 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-08-03 0:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03 3:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-03 12:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-04 6:20 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-04 7:44 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-04 14:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-05 12:26 ` Steffen Prohaska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708062136.50462.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
--to=robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=prohaska@zib.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).