From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: [RFC] Clean way to disable pager Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:28:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20070819212827.GA5442@steel.home> References: Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 19 23:29:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IMsKT-00067h-8R for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:29:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753865AbXHSV2b (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:28:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753265AbXHSV2b (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:28:31 -0400 Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.190]:26861 "EHLO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754455AbXHSV2a (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:28:30 -0400 Received: from tigra.home (Fa819.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.168.25]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo42) (RZmta 10.3) with ESMTP id J01bafj7JJVDtM for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:28:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2A2277BD for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:28:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by steel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7853ABDFB; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:28:27 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-RZG-AUTH: z4gQVF2k5XWuW3Ccul2ggTc4XQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy, Sun, Aug 19, 2007 19:26:07 +0200: > I think that deserves an less-hacky, and documented way. I'd suggest a > --no-pager, or --dont-paginate, that would do the opposite of -p as a > global option for git. Ack. Besides, some platforms having no way to unset an environment variable, a really cumbersome to work with them (Cygwin/Win32, yes), so this switch is actually the only way to achive something stable.