From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Cc: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: confused about preserved permissions
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:43:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070820194328.GE8542@efreet.light.src> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070820184829.GA8617@glandium.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1960 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 20:48:29 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:40:13PM +0200, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:58:43PM +0200, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> > >> > I also never understood why there were no permissions set on
> > >> > directories in trees...
> > >>
> > >> Because directories are not actually tracked. They are created and
> > >> deleted as-needed.
> > >
> > > I don't see why it would prevent to have a permission set to
> > > it... the permission technically can be recorded in the parent tree,
> > > along its sha1. Filesystems are also like this.
> >
> > No, they aren't. Filesystems don't create and delete directories on
> > the fly. If we record any information about a directory, deleting it
> > automagically would not be appropriate since we would lose information
> > that has not been explicitly deleted.
>
> git doesn't magically create directories either. It actually stores
> something about them: the hash of the tree object that represents them.
> And it has permissions associated with these hashes.
>
> What it doesn't have, though, is tracking of the directory's history.
Git does not have tracking of file's history either.
There are actually no permissions to record with a directory, since only
executable bit is tracked and that always has to be turned on.
Git actually does store directories in tree objects, but never in the index.
There was a long thread about tracking existence of directories. IMNSHO the
index can start to *always* contain directories, with reader being able to
detect index written without them and automatically fill them in, to keep
compatibility. Than a config option could switch between removing empty
directories implicitly when there are no versioned files in them, or
explicitely.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-20 16:44 confused about preserved permissions martin f krafft
2007-08-20 16:54 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-08-20 17:38 ` martin f krafft
2007-08-20 17:41 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 17:58 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-20 18:13 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 18:44 ` David Kastrup
[not found] ` <86zm0mgicy.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
2007-08-20 18:48 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 19:43 ` Jan Hudec [this message]
2007-08-20 19:50 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 20:07 ` Alex Riesen
2007-08-20 20:10 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 20:27 ` Jan Hudec
2007-08-20 20:42 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-20 20:44 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 20:08 ` Jan Hudec
2007-08-20 20:39 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-20 20:50 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-20 21:03 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-21 1:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-21 2:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-21 5:34 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-21 6:04 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-21 18:01 ` René Scharfe
2007-08-21 18:01 ` [PATCH] Documentation: update tar.umask default René Scharfe
2007-08-21 21:15 ` Mike Hommey
2007-08-22 21:03 ` René Scharfe
2007-08-20 18:35 ` confused about preserved permissions Alex Riesen
2007-08-22 12:18 ` Benoit SIGOURE
2007-08-22 12:52 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-08-22 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-23 6:00 ` martin f krafft
2007-08-23 6:12 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-23 6:23 ` martin f krafft
2007-08-23 7:48 ` Benoit SIGOURE
2007-08-23 7:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-23 8:08 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-03 18:59 ` Jan Hudec
2007-08-23 7:03 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070820194328.GE8542@efreet.light.src \
--to=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mh@glandium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).