Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple branches and git-svn
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:12:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070821151243.GA29020@artemis.corp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070821115611.GA21410@mimvista.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2161 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:56:11AM +0000, David Watson wrote:
> Now, I'm not sure this is 100% the fault of git-svn. Perhaps keeping its
> metadata about which SVN branch it's connected to isn't the best thing, but
> git-merge is doing exactly what you ask for. Perhaps we need a merge command in
> git-svn that does the right thing? Although what that right thing would be, I'm
> not quite sure.  Either way, there needs to be a BIG GIGANTIC WARNING in the
> git-svn manual that if you actually use git for what it claims to be great at
> (i.e., merging) you may be in for a world of pain, with your coworkers and boss
> coming at you with pitchforks and torches. Especially because there are
> so many git users who need to interoperate with SVN.

  IMHO here is what git-svn should do. It should use the not-so-new
remotes mechanism, and have all the svn remotes branches under a remote
namespace, clean, simple, and also knowing which "upstream" svn "thing"
it's following.

  Then, when you just git checkout --track -b <branch> <svn-remote/foo>

  hack hack hack
  git commit
  hack hack hack
  git commit
  git merge <svn-remote/another-branch>
  hack hack hack
  git commit

  and then you just want to:

  git svn dcommit.

  Using the fact that <branch> tracks <svn-remote/foo> and that
<svn-remote/foo> is in fact the plain mirror of upstream's branch foo,
it should be able to know where to actually commit and wrt what it has
to make history clean.


  IMHO a git-$scm gateway just has to feed "remotes" branches, and
provide some plumbing commands (like dcommit) to be able to feed some
changes to the other $scm, with a workflow like this one:

  1. pull $scm into a shadow git repository
  2. import/merge $scm changes into your local branch
  3. make changes / merges whatever
  4. push $scm..<yourbranch> into $scm
  5. goto 1, so that you can "win" your changes from 4. back in the $scm
     local shadow repository.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-21 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-15 10:17 Multiple branches and git-svn David Kastrup
2007-08-21 10:06 ` Benoit SIGOURE
2007-08-21 11:04   ` David Kastrup
2007-08-21 11:56     ` David Watson
2007-08-21 12:35       ` David Kastrup
2007-08-21 12:53         ` David Kastrup
2007-08-21 15:12       ` Pierre Habouzit [this message]
2007-08-21 17:51         ` Benoit SIGOURE
2007-08-21 17:55       ` Benoit SIGOURE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070821151243.GA29020@artemis.corp \
    --to=madcoder@debian.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox