From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: stgit 0.13 import mbox problems Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:42:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20070823184201.GA17601@kroah.com> References: <20070823092254.GA5976@kroah.com> <20070823164322.GC5528@kroah.com> <20070823183111.GB15684@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Catalin Marinas , git@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 23 20:49:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IOHk8-0000wU-Hc for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:49:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765044AbXHWStQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:49:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765011AbXHWStQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:49:16 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:56503 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764988AbXHWStO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:49:14 -0400 Received: from dsl093-040-174.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.40.174] helo=localhost) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1IOHjz-0000BI-M9; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:49:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070823183111.GB15684@fieldses.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:31:11PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:43:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > I really do like quilt, but wanted to see how well my current workflow > > could be by using stgit as I'm constantly rebasing the main kernel > > version against -git snapshots and sometimes that isn't frequent enough. > > So just want to be able to rebase more than once a day? Then why not > just run quilt on top of git? Pop off all your quilt patches, git pull, > push them all back on again.... Yes, I can do that, but I already keep the patch set in a different git tree, so that others can sync up with me at times. I was just thinking that it might be easier to use stgit and then only have to use one git tree to do everything, as this is what stgit is for :) Just always trying to see if I can make my life easier and help out with making git better overall... thanks, greg k-h