* [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
@ 2007-08-26 18:35 Brian Hetro
2007-08-27 8:25 ` Jeff King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brian Hetro @ 2007-08-26 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List
Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
is expected.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
---
git-commit.sh | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-commit.sh b/git-commit.sh
index d7e7028..1d04f1f 100755
--- a/git-commit.sh
+++ b/git-commit.sh
@@ -49,10 +49,11 @@ run_status () {
export GIT_INDEX_FILE
fi
- case "$status_only" in
- t) color= ;;
- *) color=--nocolor ;;
- esac
+ if test "$status_only" = "t" -o "$use_status_color" = "t"; then
+ color=
+ else
+ color=--nocolor
+ fi
git runstatus ${color} \
${verbose:+--verbose} \
${amend:+--amend} \
@@ -556,6 +557,7 @@ fi
if [ "$?" != "0" -a ! -f "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD" -a -z "$amend" ]
then
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/COMMIT_EDITMSG" "$GIT_DIR/SQUASH_MSG"
+ use_status_color=t
run_status
exit 1
fi
--
1.5.3.rc6.23.g0058-dirty
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
2007-08-26 18:35 [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting Brian Hetro
@ 2007-08-27 8:25 ` Jeff King
2007-08-27 9:45 ` Brian Hetro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2007-08-27 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:35:26PM -0400, Brian Hetro wrote:
> Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
> the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
> to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
> and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
> is expected.
Thanks, this had been annoying me for a while. For some reason, I was
thinking that it was not going to be trivial to fix, because I thought
for efficiency reasons we only ran run_status once and used the output
for either the commit template or for dumping to the user. But I can't
seem to find any revision where that is the case, so obviously somebody
spiked my drink. For a month.
A minor nit on the implementation:
> + if test "$status_only" = "t" -o "$use_status_color" = "t"; then
> + color=
> + else
> + color=--nocolor
> + fi
This variable doesn't really say "use color"; it says "don't explicitly
turn off color". So perhaps there is a better name (respect_color or
similar)?
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
2007-08-27 8:25 ` Jeff King
@ 2007-08-27 9:45 ` Brian Hetro
2007-08-27 10:15 ` Jeff King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brian Hetro @ 2007-08-27 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:25:50 -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:35:26PM -0400, Brian Hetro wrote:
>
> > Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
> > the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
> > to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
> > and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
> > is expected.
> A minor nit on the implementation:
>
> > + if test "$status_only" = "t" -o "$use_status_color" = "t"; then
> > + color=
> > + else
> > + color=--nocolor
> > + fi
>
> This variable doesn't really say "use color"; it says "don't explicitly
> turn off color". So perhaps there is a better name (respect_color or
> similar)?
I was thinking more along the lines of "use color as if you had run
git-status" when I decided on $use_status_color. Perhaps there is a
better name.
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
2007-08-27 9:45 ` Brian Hetro
@ 2007-08-27 10:15 ` Jeff King
2007-08-27 16:15 ` Brian Hetro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2007-08-27 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:45:43AM -0400, Brian Hetro wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of "use color as if you had run
> git-status" when I decided on $use_status_color. Perhaps there is a
> better name.
I wonder if the implementation below is slightly more readable.
BTW, I suspect Junio will not apply this until post-1.5.3; I am starting
a queue of such patches that I care about and will re-send after the
release.
-Peff
---
diff --git a/git-commit.sh b/git-commit.sh
index d7e7028..96cec04 100755
--- a/git-commit.sh
+++ b/git-commit.sh
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ git rev-parse --verify HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1 || initial_commit=t
case "$0" in
*status)
status_only=t
+ no_override_color=t
;;
*commit)
status_only=
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ run_status () {
export GIT_INDEX_FILE
fi
- case "$status_only" in
+ case "$no_override_color" in
t) color= ;;
*) color=--nocolor ;;
esac
@@ -556,7 +557,7 @@ fi
if [ "$?" != "0" -a ! -f "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD" -a -z "$amend" ]
then
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/COMMIT_EDITMSG" "$GIT_DIR/SQUASH_MSG"
- run_status
+ no_override_color=t run_status
exit 1
fi
>
> Brian
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
2007-08-27 10:15 ` Jeff King
@ 2007-08-27 16:15 ` Brian Hetro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brian Hetro @ 2007-08-27 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:15:09 -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:45:43AM -0400, Brian Hetro wrote:
>
> > I was thinking more along the lines of "use color as if you had run
> > git-status" when I decided on $use_status_color. Perhaps there is a
> > better name.
>
> I wonder if the implementation below is slightly more readable.
I do prefer your implementation. There is no need to depend on
status_only here.
> I am starting a queue of such patches that I care about and will
> re-send after the release.
Please do.
> ---
> diff --git a/git-commit.sh b/git-commit.sh
> index d7e7028..96cec04 100755
> --- a/git-commit.sh
> +++ b/git-commit.sh
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ git rev-parse --verify HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1 || initial_commit=t
> case "$0" in
> *status)
> status_only=t
> + no_override_color=t
> ;;
> *commit)
> status_only=
> @@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ run_status () {
> export GIT_INDEX_FILE
> fi
>
> - case "$status_only" in
> + case "$no_override_color" in
> t) color= ;;
> *) color=--nocolor ;;
> esac
> @@ -556,7 +557,7 @@ fi
> if [ "$?" != "0" -a ! -f "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD" -a -z "$amend" ]
> then
> rm -f "$GIT_DIR/COMMIT_EDITMSG" "$GIT_DIR/SQUASH_MSG"
> - run_status
> + no_override_color=t run_status
> exit 1
> fi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-27 16:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-26 18:35 [PATCH] When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting Brian Hetro
2007-08-27 8:25 ` Jeff King
2007-08-27 9:45 ` Brian Hetro
2007-08-27 10:15 ` Jeff King
2007-08-27 16:15 ` Brian Hetro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).