From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] In Examples, explain option -r and refer to git-rev-list[1] Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20070827100244.GA23248@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <46D28502.3030003@etek.chalmers.se> <7vy7fxl7hx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbqctl6ky.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070827084423.GA19230@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vy7fxjo90.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jari Aalto , Git Mailing List , Lukas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sandstr=F6m?= To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 12:02:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPbQp-0006t8-GA for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:02:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751251AbXH0KCr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751246AbXH0KCr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:47 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:1197 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751233AbXH0KCr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:47 -0400 Received: (qmail 30225 invoked by uid 111); 27 Aug 2007 10:02:46 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:45 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vy7fxjo90.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:55:07AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > But yes, this is post-1.5.3, so I will shut up rather than nitpicking > > your "not meant to be applied now" patches. > > Thanks for your comments; rather than shutting up, could you > send an improvement after 1.5.3 happens? Will do. -Peff