From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: Git and OpenDocument (OpenOffice.org) files Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:16:00 +0200 Organization: glandium.org Message-ID: <20070827141600.GA11000@glandium.org> References: <7vps19jnm1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070827130346.GA8821@glandium.org> <866431rser.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 16:17:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPfOo-0004r8-KL for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:17:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754846AbXH0OQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:16:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751231AbXH0OQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:16:59 -0400 Received: from vawad.err.no ([85.19.200.177]:47934 "EHLO vawad.err.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbXH0OQ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:16:58 -0400 Received: from aputeaux-153-1-29-74.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.124.191.74] helo=vaio.glandium.org) by vawad.err.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IPfOd-0004UL-DF; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:16:54 +0200 Received: from mh by vaio.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IPfNo-0002rz-7u; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:16:00 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <866431rser.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mh@glandium.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vaio.glandium.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Status: (score 0.0): Status=No hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=3.1.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 03:58:04PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > >> BTW, wouldn't it be more efficient to store the odf files unzipped ? > > > > Efficient how? Speed-wise: no. Space-wise: yes. > > Huh? At least the "Space-wise: yes" seems rather nonsensical. A zipped file will be 100% different at each revision. The unzipped counterpart may be similar for 90% or more between revisions. Mike