From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: git-svn tags and branches Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:31:38 +0200 Organization: glandium.org Message-ID: <20070827153138.GA12936@glandium.org> References: <867inhqaj9.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 17:33:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPgaf-0001EH-Sm for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:33:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755196AbXH0PdS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:33:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755352AbXH0PdR (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:33:17 -0400 Received: from vawad.err.no ([85.19.200.177]:54601 "EHLO vawad.err.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751020AbXH0PdR (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:33:17 -0400 Received: from aputeaux-153-1-29-74.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.124.191.74] helo=vaio.glandium.org) by vawad.err.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IPgZu-0003e2-GW; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:33:03 +0200 Received: from mh by vaio.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IPgZ0-0003NX-AE; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:31:38 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <867inhqaj9.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mh@glandium.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vaio.glandium.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Status: (score 0.0): Status=No hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=3.1.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:09:30PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > I actually don't see how one can safely make them tags at all (rather > than branches) since Subversion does not enforce the members of a > "tags" subdirectory to remain unchanged after the initial copy. > Basically, tags are not different from branches in Subversion from > what you can do with them. Well, git-svn could make tags when the tag/branch is created in subversion, and then create a branch on the first commit on top of that tag/branch in svn. Mike