From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: repo.or.cz wishes? Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:16:00 +0200 Message-ID: <200708280116.00537.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <20070826235944.GM1219@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin Mares , Sven Verdoolaege To: Linus Torvalds , Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 28 01:34:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPnr9-0006F7-Jt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:18:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754947AbXH0XQZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:16:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752165AbXH0XQY (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:16:24 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:37797 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754572AbXH0XQD (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:16:03 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1308704nfb for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:16:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=j/2FDtt9wrYFMFIDCzVbsj1sORjKaQz0rGUhbKe2W+1cCSPTx7S5N7K7a4Img6q+u+B27WUflFByjXBmlrho77XKWO5kXCTdt/E9H++hVqqed3AISS2GwXVEI9HT+Imi4app7AmhW6PN+f6+ARfYpTmTwHdpUgQ/HK/ygbjdfMs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ONfhgnYX8+a5okVs7sxUrVkk+f6V1ZzKxMYypWVIGH8BC5G2I9Zk/ZcnRnWcsQUWhmEcsfEKUgmG+20UmQONidKhRFl96oahPjwXQcFodeXOdm0398b0k5OhO26v/PQ5ptVQ4mh4jwWFwxjk0xs7nhxf+nYLSUyAQVhBc9h9uBo= Received: by 10.86.84.5 with SMTP id h5mr5295432fgb.1188256561661; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-89-229-8-65.torun.mm.pl ( [89.229.8.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm5539419fkt.2007.08.27.16.15.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:15:59 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > As to your TLS example: if we were to do "git over TLS", it would make > perfect sense to use either "tls://" (although "gits://" might be more > natural, not because tls is wrong, but because people have gotten used to > "https://") if we were to have a "secure git" port. Or maybe we'd use the > same port number that we already have assigned for git, and just add some > "use TLS to authenticate/encrypt", and use "tls://" for that. It makes > perfect sense. I like gits:// idea for "git over TLS", and I'm against "tls://". I wonder if it would be hard to implement "git overt TLS"? We could resurrect patch which allowed push over git protocol, onnly restricting pushing to gits protocol. -- Jakub Narebski Poland