From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Verdoolaege Subject: Re: repo.or.cz wishes? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:32:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20070829073212.GQ1976MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> References: <20070826235944.GM1219@pasky.or.cz> <200708272358.43021.jnareb@gmail.com> <20070828084939.GF1976MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> <200708282356.10605.jnareb@gmail.com> Reply-To: skimo@liacs.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 29 09:32:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IQI2D-0008U0-Tc for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:32:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbXH2HcP (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:32:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752101AbXH2HcO (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:32:14 -0400 Received: from psmtp09.wxs.nl ([195.121.247.23]:41439 "EHLO psmtp09.wxs.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751712AbXH2HcO (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:32:14 -0400 Received: from greensroom.kotnet.org (ip54515aaa.direct-adsl.nl [84.81.90.170]) by psmtp09.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.15 (built Nov 14 2006)) with SMTP id <0JNI0047ZY9OW1@psmtp09.wxs.nl> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:32:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 14281 invoked by uid 500); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:32:12 +0000 In-reply-to: <200708282356.10605.jnareb@gmail.com> Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:56:10PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > On Tue, 28 August 2007, Sven Verdoolaege wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:58:42PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> > >> The problem is that repo.or.cz needs support for that in gitweb, while > >> gitweb in turn needs support for that in git. This needs git consensus > >> on how to specify object database location (or just gitdir) for > >> submodules, to have later submodule support in gitweb. > > > > What would be the use of that (outside of gitweb) ? > > For the hypothetical (planned?) future '--recurse-submodules' option > to git-diff family, git-ls-tree and git-ls-files, git-fetch and git-push > (but I think not git-pull), perhaps git-log (besides what it supports > by the way of git-diff-tree), maybe even git-status and git-commit. Ah... you're talking about bare repositories, right? For non-bare repos, I'd assume you would only recurse for those submodules that you have actually checked out in your working tree. skimo