Re: People unaware of the importance of "git gc"?

[Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2295 bytes --]

On Wednesday 05 September 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
> > I personally repack everything way more often than is necessary, and I had 
> > kind of assumed that people did it that way, but I was apparently wrong. 
> > Comments?
> 
> I am as old timer as you are so I am not qualified to add much
> variety to the discussion, but I agree that excessive cruft is
> something we should warn the user about.
> 
> I personally was _extremely_ annoyed by git-cvsimport
> occassionary deciding to repack whenever it finds more than
> certain number of loose objects, not because it is a big import,
> but because I happened to start the command to start a very
> small import after doing my own development for a while to
> accumulate loose objects, and I really hate automatic repacking
> for any operation (or tool that thinks it knows better than I do
> in general).
> 
> Perhaps _exiting_ "git-commit" and "git-fetch" before doing
> anything, when the repository has more than 5000 loose objects
> with a LOUD bang that instructs an immediate repack would be
> good?
> 
> I really do not like the idea of automatically running a repack
> after first interrupting the original command and then resuming.
> For one thing it would make a horribly difficult situation to
> debug if anything goes wrong.  You cannot reproduce such a
> situation easily.

What about some sort of middle ground:

When git-fetch and git-commit has done its job and is about to exit, it checks 
the number of loose object, and if too high tells the user something 
like "There are too many loose objects in the repo, do you want me to repack? 
(y/N)". If the user answers "n" or simply <Enter>, it exits immediately 
without doing anything, but if the user answers "y", or if there is no 
response, say, within a minute (i.e. the user went to lunch), the repack is 
initiated. (Of course, the user should be told that a Ctrl-C will abort the 
repack and not be harmful in any way.)

If the user answers "n" (or aborts the repack), the question will keep popping 
up on the next git-{commit,fetch} to remind/annoy the user until a repack is 
done.


...Johan

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]