From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: testsuite problems Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:04:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20070917220408.GG19019@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <20070917211742.GF19019@genesis.frugalware.org> <46EEF6A8.1030308@lsrfire.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vJguvTgX93MxBIIe" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Scharfe X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 18 00:06:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXOjR-0003e6-7D for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:06:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753040AbXIQWEQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:04:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752838AbXIQWEQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:04:16 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:44942 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752554AbXIQWEP (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:04:15 -0400 Received: from frugalware.elte.hu ([157.181.177.34] helo=genesis.frugalware.org) by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1IXOhS-00079U-6a from ; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:04:14 +0200 Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC6371678012; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46EEF6A8.1030308@lsrfire.ath.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13cvs-muttng-frugalware (2007-01-09) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.4 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.4 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --vJguvTgX93MxBIIe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:50:32PM +0200, Ren=E9 Scharfe wrote: > The failing tests check ZIP file creation, not tar file creation. > Perhaps your unzip command works a bit differently from Info-ZIP's? $ zip -v Copyright (c) 1990-2006 Info-ZIP - Type 'zip "-L"' for software license. This is Zip 2.32 (June 19th 2006), by Info-ZIP. should this version be ok? > Also, what is the difference between t/trash/a and t/trash/d/a after > running the test script (that's what test 21 is comparing)? $ diff -Naur t/trash/a t/trash/d/a diff -Naur t/trash/a/l1 t/trash/d/a/l1 --- t/trash/a/l1 2007-09-17 23:10:03.000000000 +0200 +++ t/trash/d/a/l1 2007-09-17 23:10:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -simple textfile +a \ No newline at end of file thanks, - VMiklos --vJguvTgX93MxBIIe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG7vnYe81tAgORUJYRAuQlAKCjMYHKp2XJcKjSGvyXDKW6/OUkxwCgpsfE pksfP/7WNRiehpUHo7/kep0= =FjoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vJguvTgX93MxBIIe--