From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: question about git-send-email Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:51:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20070926075125.GM18370@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur" To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 26 09:51:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IaRgH-0004to-Is for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:51:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753917AbXIZHv2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:51:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753724AbXIZHv2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:51:28 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:58892 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753503AbXIZHv0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:51:26 -0400 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8637D1B2525 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642996FCE9 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2377413A4129; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13cvs-muttng-frugalware (2007-01-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline hi, maybe i do not use git-send-email as it's expected so here is my workflow for a patch: 1) git format-patch 2) add additional comments between --- and diffstat 3) add to the patch 4) add cc the patch 5) add in-reply-to to the patch 6) invoke git send-email 2), 4) and 5) are read properly from the edited patch, but it asks again for 3). it seems it asks for the to field before it parses the mail. even worse, then it sends the mail with duplicated 'to' header if one was in the mail already. i tried to fix it but it doesn't seem to be so trivial to me and i'm not a perl wizard :) also i'm not sure if this usage is ok or not. just i think it's a bit confusing that 'cc' is read from the patch, but 'to'. thanks, - VMiklos --zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+g99e81tAgORUJYRAq67AJ0YJcLk9d/I7ftqe8MWEqOUQmkEuwCglUuy eCzqfOVDmGox68B2qafjBT8= =jFm+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur--