Re: git-push [--all] and tags

[martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1097 bytes --]

also sprach Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [2007.10.07.0226 +0100]:
> Well, I agrewe with Martin, and I think you missed his point.

(he did)

> Hmm? I do agree with "git push" as it now stands has a lot of warts, 
> although I don't really agree with the people who want to change the 
> default behavior.

So am I right if I say that all the logic should really be happening
in send-pack and that push is really just an interface when it comes
to selecting the refs to push, so it should basically feed through
the options and refs, meaning that send-pack should get --tags and
--shared as well?

Or should push enumerate all refs needed and pass them directly to
send-pack, effectively making send-pack's --all option obsolete?

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
 
"time flies like an arrow. fruit flies like a banana."
                                                       -- groucho marx
(panda eats shoots and leaves)
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]