Re: Many gits are offline this week

["Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>]

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> 
> > For that matter, gitweb is essentially a limited porcelain. And this 
> > points out that all VCSes have alternative porcelains, but git is 
> > unusual in having convenient plumbing to support and encourage this.
> 
> I do not consider viewers "porcelain".  And gitweb is essentially just a 
> viewer.

So you don't consider gitk to be porcelain?  I do.  The plumbing
output of git-rev-list is uh, ugly.  gitk may still not be the best
looking application on the internet but it sure beats looking at
rev-list output by eye.

Porcelain is really anything that calls plumbing to make the task
of invoking or processing the output of plumbing easier on the
human using it.  That's it.  Obviously you can work Git by just the
plumbing.  Just like you can compute SHA-1 by hand.  You just choose
not to as the time it would take is more than you want to invest.
Or have left in this mortal existance...

I almost always forget about the web interfaces.  There's a number
of them and I don't use them often enough to really think about it.
I don't know why I always forget about them.  I never forget about
StGit or qgit, and yet I never use those either...

-- 
Shawn.