From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mergetool: support absolute paths to tools by git config merge.<tool>path
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:57:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071008215729.GC31713@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11918785613855-git-send-email-prohaska@zib.de>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:22:40PM +0200, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
> This commit adds a mechanism to provide absolute paths to the
> commands called by 'git mergetool'. A path can be specified
> in the configuation variable merge.<toolname>path.
This patch doesn't work the config file doesn't specify an explicit
mergetool via merge.tool. The reason for that is this loop:
for i in $merge_tool_candidates; do
if test $i = emerge ; then
cmd=emacs
else
cmd=$i
fi
if type $cmd > /dev/null 2>&1; then
merge_tool=$i
break
fi
done
is only checking to see if $cmd is in the path; it's not looking up
the merge.<toolname>path variable in this loop.
I guess the other question is whether we would be better off simply
telling the user to specify an absolute pathname in merge.tool, and
then having git-mergetool strip off the directory path via basename,
and then on window systems, stripping off the .EXE or .COM suffix, and
then downcasing the name so that something like "C:\Program
Files\ECMerge\ECMerge.exe" gets translated to "ecmerge". Would I be
right in guessing that the reason why you used merge.<toolname>path
approach was to avoid this messy headache?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-08 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 21:22 [PATCH] mergetool: support absolute paths to tools by git config merge.<tool>path Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-08 21:22 ` [PATCH] mergetool: add support for ECMerge Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-08 21:44 ` Theodore Tso
2007-10-09 6:14 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-09 12:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-09 12:49 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-09 13:03 ` Alan Hadsell
2007-10-09 13:17 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-09 14:21 ` Alan Hadsell
2007-10-08 21:57 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2007-10-08 22:01 ` [PATCH] mergetool: support absolute paths to tools by git config merge.<tool>path Theodore Tso
2007-10-09 6:30 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-08 22:00 ` Frank Lichtenheld
2007-10-09 6:42 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-10-09 12:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071008215729.GC31713@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prohaska@zib.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).