From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH] mergetool: support absolute paths to tools by git config merge.path Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:01:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20071008220123.GD31713@thunk.org> References: <11918785613855-git-send-email-prohaska@zib.de> <20071008215729.GC31713@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Steffen Prohaska X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 09 00:01:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1If0fO-0005Nl-R7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:01:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752933AbXJHWB0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:01:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752905AbXJHWB0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:01:26 -0400 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:44115 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752864AbXJHWBZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:01:25 -0400 Received: from root (helo=candygram.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtps (tls_cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1If0ow-00013U-9M; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:11:26 -0400 Received: from tytso by candygram.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1If0fD-0005Fe-G6; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:01:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071008215729.GC31713@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:57:29PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > This patch doesn't work the config file doesn't specify an explicit > mergetool via merge.tool. The reason for that is this loop: Err, let me try that again. "This patch doesn't work IF the config file doesn't specify an explicit > mergetool via merge.tool." Sorry about the missing conjuction; the sentence doesn't make much sense without it... - Ted