From: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-blame shouldn't crash if run in an unmerged tree
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:31:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071018083105.GA21768@atjola.homenet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071018063407.GA28861@spearce.org>
On 2007.10.18 02:34:07 -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> I'm applying this patch to my maint tree tonight as it does resolve
> the issue for now. What surprised me was the file that we were
> crashing out on wasn't even the file we wanted to get the blame
> data for. :-\
The first merge moved some code from file1 (which doesn't exist in the
branch anymore) into file2, so I guess the code move detection comes
into play here.
Actually, in the original case that crashed here, I was curious about
some lines in file2 which looked like they had been automatically merged
from file1, so I tried to use git blame with file2 to see if that really
happened (I didn't expect git to be even able to follow code moves while
merging). Unfortunately, I didn't get such a test case yet, which might
indicate that I've only imagined that merge, and thinking about it, I
think that file2 wasn't marked as modified in "git status". Hm, I'll try
to find that merge conflict again and try that again.
Björn
>
> --8>--
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] git-blame shouldn't crash if run in an unmerged tree
>
> If we are in the middle of resolving a merge conflict there may be
> one or more files whose entries in the index represent an unmerged
> state (index entries in the higher-order stages).
>
> Attempting to run git-blame on any file in such a working directory
> resulted in "fatal: internal error: ce_mode is 0" as we use the magic
> marker for an unmerged entry is 0 (set up by things like diff-lib.c's
> do_diff_cache() and builtin-read-tree.c's read_tree_unmerged())
> and the ce_match_stat_basic() function gets upset about this.
>
> I'm not entirely sure that the whole "ce_mode = 0" case is a good
> idea to begin with, and maybe the right thing to do is to remove
> that horrid freakish special case, but removing the internal error
> seems to be the simplest fix for now.
>
> Linus
>
> [sp: Thanks to Björn Steinbrink for the test case]
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
> ---
> read-cache.c | 2 +
> t/t8004-blame.sh | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 t/t8004-blame.sh
>
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index 536f4d0..928e8fa 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static int ce_match_stat_basic(struct cache_entry *ce, struct stat *st)
> else if (ce_compare_gitlink(ce))
> changed |= DATA_CHANGED;
> return changed;
> + case 0: /* Special case: unmerged file in index */
> + return MODE_CHANGED | DATA_CHANGED | TYPE_CHANGED;
> default:
> die("internal error: ce_mode is %o", ntohl(ce->ce_mode));
> }
> diff --git a/t/t8004-blame.sh b/t/t8004-blame.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..ba19ac1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t8004-blame.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +# Based on a test case submitted by Björn Steinbrink.
> +
> +test_description='git blame on conflicted files'
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +test_expect_success 'setup first case' '
> + # Create the old file
> + echo "Old line" > file1 &&
> + git add file1 &&
> + git commit --author "Old Line <ol@localhost>" -m file1.a &&
> +
> + # Branch
> + git checkout -b foo &&
> +
> + # Do an ugly move and change
> + git rm file1 &&
> + echo "New line ..." > file2 &&
> + echo "... and more" >> file2 &&
> + git add file2 &&
> + git commit --author "U Gly <ug@localhost>" -m ugly &&
> +
> + # Back to master and change something
> + git checkout master &&
> + echo "
> +
> +bla" >> file1 &&
> + git commit --author "Old Line <ol@localhost>" -a -m file1.b &&
> +
> + # Back to foo and merge master
> + git checkout foo &&
> + if git merge master; then
> + echo needed conflict here
> + exit 1
> + else
> + echo merge failed - resolving automatically
> + fi &&
> + echo "New line ...
> +... and more
> +
> +bla
> +Even more" > file2 &&
> + git rm file1 &&
> + git commit --author "M Result <mr@localhost>" -a -m merged &&
> +
> + # Back to master and change file1 again
> + git checkout master &&
> + sed s/bla/foo/ <file1 >X &&
> + rm file1 &&
> + mv X file1 &&
> + git commit --author "No Bla <nb@localhost>" -a -m replace &&
> +
> + # Try to merge into foo again
> + git checkout foo &&
> + if git merge master; then
> + echo needed conflict here
> + exit 1
> + else
> + echo merge failed - test is setup
> + fi
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success \
> + 'blame runs on unconflicted file while other file has conflicts' '
> + git blame file2
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'blame runs on conflicted file in stages 1,3' '
> + git blame file1
> +'
> +
> +test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-18 6:34 [PATCH] git-blame shouldn't crash if run in an unmerged tree Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-18 8:31 ` Björn Steinbrink [this message]
2007-10-18 9:21 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-10-18 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071018083105.GA21768@atjola.homenet \
--to=b.steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox