From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation/git-gc: improve description of --auto Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:45:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20071019044517.GA18354@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071019020510.GB7711@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20071019022909.GZ14735@spearce.org> <20071019023850.GD8298@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Steven Grimm , Brian Gernhardt To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 19 06:45:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iijjn-0001tv-ON for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:45:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751625AbXJSEpV (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:45:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751453AbXJSEpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:45:20 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3885 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbXJSEpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:45:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 9159 invoked by uid 111); 19 Oct 2007 04:45:19 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:45:19 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:45:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071019023850.GD8298@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:38:50PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > I am hunting this down right now. asciidoc _does_ generate > XML foo for `foo`, but it looks like docbook is > throwing that away when converting to manpages. Hopefully there is an > easy tweak... Ugh. Looks like Junio came up with a solution to this in 524e5ffc (although it was for literallayout sections, I think the same technique could be applied). However, it had problems with docbook 1.69, and was reverted in 63c21c49. Julian Phillips added monospacing of listingblocks in 281a53bb, but that technique is only applicable to asciidoc "blocks", which I think won't work in this instance. It really seems silly that docbook doesn't monospace s when converting to manpages. Perhaps somebody who knows more about docbook than I do can say more. -Peff