From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-pack: respect '+' on wildcard refspecs Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:22:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20071020042257.GA26755@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071019090400.GA8944@coredump.intra.peff.net> <449c10960710190510y3af3ffa2ydb9ae4a01b5d480c@mail.gmail.com> <20071019122755.GA17002@coredump.intra.peff.net> <449c10960710190638j5823b19dl903ae369965e884e@mail.gmail.com> <20071019134339.GA21852@coredump.intra.peff.net> <449c10960710191800j3e61b80cma2c582080c1dd07c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dan McGee , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 20 06:23:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ij5rp-00009M-Em for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:23:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751955AbXJTEXB (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:23:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751924AbXJTEXB (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:23:01 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:4498 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751878AbXJTEXA (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:23:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 18479 invoked by uid 111); 20 Oct 2007 04:22:58 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:22:58 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:22:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <449c10960710191800j3e61b80cma2c582080c1dd07c@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:00:37PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > Turns out I didn't have GIT_EXEC_PATH set up right. Once I do that, > everything seems to work just fine. > > Thanks for looking into this Jeff, and git-bisect just won me over. It > made easy work of finding the commit that broke this. Huzzah, success! Shawn, this should probably go on 'maint'. Although it is probably not high priority (it has been broken since May; I think wildcard push refspecs must not be that common), it is a fairly trivial fix that shouldn't impact anyone else. -Peff