From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Parish Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deduce exec_path also from calls to git with a relative path Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:04:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20071020230414.GB16291@srparish.net> References: <1192868006.v2.fusewebmail-240137@f> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 21 03:55:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjQ24-0001c8-Q2 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:55:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752308AbXJUBya (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:54:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753514AbXJUBy3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:54:29 -0400 Received: from smtp-gw3.mailanyone.net ([208.101.54.178]:36866 "EHLO smtp-gw3.mailanyone.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753484AbXJUBy2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:54:28 -0400 Received: from mailanyone.net by smtp-gw3.mailanyone.net with esmtp (MailAnyone extSMTP) id 1IjNTH-0003NQ-9q for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:11:07 -0500 Received: from mailanyone.net by smtp-gw6.mailanyone.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (MailAnyone extSMTP srp) id 1IjNMh-0005fi-GP; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:04:20 -0500 Received: by srparish.net (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 502 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) srp@srparish.net; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:31:47PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > BTW I did not mean to discourage you... Rather, I wanted to show you that > this list is a wonderful place to learn, as I did, do, and will do many > times here. (Just to clarify, since somebody said that I am usually not > nice to newbies... cannot understand that at all ;-) Nah, i'm actually rather encouraged that people have shown interest in my patches and are so quick to find ways to improve on them! Sorry about the top posting earlier; i've been away from active open source participation for a while and have been forgetting my etiquette. sRp -- Scott Parish http://srparish.net/