From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hasselstr=F6m?= Subject: Re: Proposed git mv behavioral change Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:00:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20071022140015.GA1992@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> References: <20071019031959.GE14735@spearce.org> <20071019032407.GA10622@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7E3647F4-E61C-4FBE-9AA7-81CDBE324308@MIT.EDU> <20071019033500.GB10697@coredump.intra.peff.net> <93BF5798-F1C3-48EE-8233-A0F111BF8138@MIT.EDU> <20071019034704.GB11095@coredump.intra.peff.net> <1192859748.13347.146.camel@g4mdd.entnet> <20071020062400.GA30388@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20071020063628.GV14735@spearce.org> <20071020064003.GA30605@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , Ari Entlich , Michael Witten , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 22 16:01:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ijxq1-0000m8-4W for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:01:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751870AbXJVOAt convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:00:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751902AbXJVOAt (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:00:49 -0400 Received: from diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.90.142]:3283 "EHLO diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751739AbXJVOAs (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:00:48 -0400 Received: from kha by diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1IjxpI-0000bZ-00; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:00:16 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071020064003.GA30605@coredump.intra.peff.net> X-Manual-Spam-Check: kha@treskal.com, clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2007-10-20 02:40:03 -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Right. So the exact state you have in your index never actually > existed in your working tree. But that's OK if: > - the changes are trivial and obviously correct > - you're not actually planning on _committing_ that, you just want > to build the commit using the index Or - you plan to revisit the commit at a later time and verify that it's OK --=20 Karl Hasselstr=F6m, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle