From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-fetch: more terse fetch output
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 21:40:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071103204000.GA24959@glandium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711031627000.21255@xanadu.home>
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 04:30:27PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >
> > > Receiving objects: 100% (5439/5439), 1.60 MiB | 636 KiB/s, done.
> >
> > I mostly like this, but can we please just use "MB/kB" instead of
> > "MiB/KiB"?
> >
> > I hope it was some kind of joke on crazy EU bureaucrats that just wasn't
> > caught in time.
>
> I don't care either ways. In fact my own preference is for MB/kB, but
> if I had used that first I'm sure someone else would have asked for the
> purist notations.
As far as you don't claim 1MB is 1024KB, it's okay.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-03 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 5:32 [PATCH] git-fetch: more terse fetch output Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 5:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-03 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-03 20:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 20:40 ` Mike Hommey [this message]
2007-11-03 20:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 21:03 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-03 21:46 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-03 22:02 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-03 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-03 23:31 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-04 0:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-04 1:49 ` David Brown
2007-11-04 2:14 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-11-03 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-04 9:56 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-04 4:58 ` Jeff King
2007-11-04 13:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 14:01 ` Pierre Habouzit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071103204000.GA24959@glandium.org \
--to=mh@glandium.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).